New research suggests narcissistic, controlling bosses drive return-to-office mandates

midian182

Posts: 9,444   +119
Staff member
A hot potato: If working from home leads to happy, more productive employees and saves companies money in office space, parking, etc., why are so many firms implementing strict Return-To-Office (RTO) policies? According to new research, the answer could be one that many people already suspected: controlling, narcissistic bosses.

RTO policies have become one of the most divisive subjects in the tech industry. Many companies promised that the lockdown-era work-from-home orders would remain in place permanently, but most have gone back on their word with giants such as Amazon and Roblox telling staff to get back or get lost.

Bosses cite several factors for wanting their workers back: collaboration, better relationships with co-workers, socialization, etc. But the word most of them like to throw about is "productivity." As in, workers are supposedly less productive while at home.

According to a recent study published by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh (via Business Insider), the real reason behind the RTO policies is mostly due to the controlling nature of bosses and CEOs.

Now read: Why your boss really wants you back in the office

The report looked at a sample of Standard and Poor's 500 firms, examining the consequences of RTO mandates. It found that the low productivity argument didn't hold up when comparing companies' performance before and after they implemented RTO policies. One would expect better employee productivity would lead to a firm's financials or stock value improving, but this wasn't the case.

Even if an employee is more productive in the office, the associated costs of bringing them back, such as office space, can mitigate those positive effects.

"So, on average, if we take a look at all these benefits and the expense average, the net benefit is really close to zero," Mark Ma, an associate professor of business administration from Pitt's Katz Graduate School of Business, who led the study, told BI. "That's what our studies are suggesting."

This discovery led to the team delving deeper into why companies really want employees back in the office. The biggest factor is believed to be managers/CEOs using RTOs to reassert control over employees. This can make superiors feel more secure about their own jobs and careers – some may feel threatened when there are no workers to order about.

The team tested the theory by looking at companies in the S&P with higher-profile managers, confirming that RTO policies are more common in these firms. Elon Musk is one CEO who has made his feelings on working from home clear for years, previously demanding his employees get back to the office for a minimum of 40 hours per week or find work elsewhere.

Ma believes CEOs are very narcissistic, something that is hard to argue with. He thinks they were losing power after the pandemic as employees became more aware of their rights, which led to bosses wanting to pull workers back under their direct control.

The research also found that work-from-home employees can offer managers a scapegoat to explain a company's poor performance. In January last year, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff partly blamed new employees hired during the pandemic who were working from home for the firm's lack of performance and productivity.

It's estimated that 90% of companies will want employees back in the office this year, with 28% threatening to fire those who fail to comply. But with RTO policies prompting workers to quit - especially at Amazon – making those who do stay depressed, and causing many companies to actually lose money, controlling bosses seems like a fairly plausible explanation for their implementation.

Masthead: Andrea Piacquadio

Permalink to story.

 
I have stated it before, based on my experience the real factor of performance is your boss (and to some extent the company). When I have had an awesome boss, I would bend over backwards for them. It did not matter wither I was in the office or at home.

Working in the office can have pros but it depends on how social you are and the people you work with. If your employment does not allow you to socialize or you are not a social person then it does not matter.
 
New research suggests that lazy, self centered employees drive the hatred of working in an office; act like its going to prison.

New research shows you are jealous of workers improving their work style so you resort to calling them lazy.

Truth is folks who can get the wfh jobs are some of the best top IT talent in the world. We choose the companies we want to work for, we dont settle for some narcissistic boss who needs to feel valued. The folks getting jobs that dont allow it are the ones that failed to get the remote jobs.

Try evaluating your employees on performance instead of being a bully and yes, we know you are a bully by your completely pointed comment here and assuming folks are just lazy because you have to deal with a commute.

Also this article is just highlighting what folks have been saying for years now. Its only about managers that are completely incapable of evaluating an employee without staring over their shoulder. These situations just highlight how many incompetent managers are out there.
 
How many articles are we gonna get dealing with working from home?

If you have a job/career that lets you do that then that's great for you, now hush up and go away to your home office.

Alot of us, me included are perfectly fine commuting or whatever to work, I actually prefer it, working at home feels like a prison imho, now I'll hush up and go away to my on-site offices.
 
This article is a load of crap...Its about some people lack the discipline to work from home... They'll run into the kitchen , do chores around the house, watch TV.... stuff you can't do in an office. Guarantee if you look at companies metadata on pandemic WFH Employees, majority did less work or were less productive.

Also, not everyone has the space in their home for a productive work enviroment. I had one co-worker where he and his wife had to share a table in their kids bedroom during covid.

Lastly, companies that are mandating RTO are ones that spend millions of dollars leasing office space. No CEO in their right mind will tolerate that as a loss on their balance sheet...if they don't have to..
 
Looks like a bunch of people have been thororoughly indoctrinated about how things are supposed to be.

If this were 1940 you'd be the ones telling everybody how proud you were that your boss had you working 100 hours per week. That newfangled 40-hour work week is for the lazy and self-centered, after all.
 
This article is a load of crap...Its about some people lack the discipline to work from home... They'll run into the kitchen , do chores around the house, watch TV.... stuff you can't do in an office. Guarantee if you look at companies metadata on pandemic WFH Employees, majority did less work or were less productive.
If someone is not productive at home, most probably he is even more disturbing in office - pretending to be busy, 'networking', poor skills but high self opinion. And, if he can being lazy at home and still can do his quota - kudos to him. If not, it will be visible in his results. I see no issue here.
Productivity is easy to trace using KPI. Haven't seen any dramatic changes pre, mid, and post pandemic there.

Also, not everyone has the space in their home for a productive work environment. I had one co-worker where he and his wife had to share a table in their kids bedroom during covid.
Sure, again - how was her KPI's? My home space is ergonomically 10 times better than my 'modern' office interiors. I agree that is a limitation, but it is really difficult to extrapolate any causality here.

Lastly, companies that are mandating RTO are ones that spend millions of dollars leasing office space. No CEO in their right mind will tolerate that as a loss on their balance sheet...if they don't have to..
How is that a loss? If all work is done, and he pays the same for the office, how having space and not hitting each other's elbows is a loss? Actually less people in office is less energy used, less water, coffee and stuff. This is exactly what this article is talking about - narcissistic bosses who simply miss meddling and micromanaging everything. No matter if all is going well, if it is going well but can't put the result to own name, they just get mad.

And still funny, in general, to see how many people are full of envy for people who have any kind of control on their own work environment. "I sit 60 hours in office, you have to do same as well or you're sooo entitled!" stuff. Nice salt to main popcorn in my HO ;)
 
People work together better when they're all in the same room.

Dare to disagree with me.

You never worked in a project environment then... the only time when we don't go anywhere is when everyone is around the table talking to each other.

You accomplish way more when you delegate instead of trying to make everyone agreeing about something they disagree.

But yeah, this is the kind of comment that we get when people are commenting out of JEALOUSY... don't worry, I am going to enjoy my work from home routine for the both of us.
 
I have stated it before, based on my experience the real factor of performance is your boss (and to some extent the company). When I have had an awesome boss, I would bend over backwards for them. It did not matter wither I was in the office or at home.

Working in the office can have pros but it depends on how social you are and the people you work with. If your employment does not allow you to socialize or you are not a social person then it does not matter.

You mean the basic of Managing people? Color me shocked!

And you pointed the real problem altogether. Return To Office has nothing to do with productivity or team building... it is all about the inability of managers to MANAGE because of their incompetence.

For 1 good managers, you probably have 4 incompetent ones. That's why businesses want people to come back, because their managers cannot do their job due to incompetence.
 
Working from home sounds easier, but it must be boring as hell with no people to talk to.

On the contrary, you are not bothered by the lunatic showing without notice to your cubicle and burning 30 minutes of your 8 hours shift for killing time.

You also have less interaction with your managers which is removing a lot of discomfort if they are micro-managers.

The pandemic demonstrated how nonsensical our work etiquette really was. Work from home literally saved my employer to deal with a burnout, MY burnout. Transiting for 2 + hours everyday is over for me. I will never go back to this.
 
This article is a load of crap...Its about some people lack the discipline to work from home... They'll run into the kitchen , do chores around the house, watch TV.... stuff you can't do in an office. Guarantee if you look at companies metadata on pandemic WFH Employees, majority did less work or were less productive.

As a manager, as long as the deliverables are on my desk at the end of the week, I COULD CARE LESS...

Many people can accomplish their workload for the day in less time they are trapped in office.

They are more motivated to accomplish their tasks faster at home, however if you request them to come in office 2 days per week, then they are going to manage their time in consequence and do some tasks only during these 2 days. Hybrid work and work from office is IN FACT, less productive.
 
This article is a load of crap...Its about some people lack the discipline to work from home... They'll run into the kitchen , do chores around the house, watch TV.... stuff you can't do in an office. Guarantee if you look at companies metadata on pandemic WFH Employees, majority did less work or were less productive.

Also, not everyone has the space in their home for a productive work enviroment. I had one co-worker where he and his wife had to share a table in their kids bedroom during covid.

Lastly, companies that are mandating RTO are ones that spend millions of dollars leasing office space. No CEO in their right mind will tolerate that as a loss on their balance sheet...if they don't have to..
Good managers dont care if you do some chores, they are not bullies. We are not slaves.

Your job should be performance based and thats how you should be evaluated. If you want to pay a monkey to stand in front of a screen to make you happy, just do it.

Top talent doesnt work from offices. They get the jobs they want which is universally wfh for most tech folks. There are of course some people who dont like it but any article stating productivity went down is flawed when you look at the data. Even the C level execs touting have admitted they f'd up. They lost their top talent and that talent went to the next company that allows remote work and now the said first company is getting nothing but bottom feeders.
 
If your employer says you work in the office, you have two choices. 1. Work in the office. 2. QUIT
YOU are the employee, not the employer! Find another job.

I would never work for a company that doesnt have qualified managers to evaluate my performance more than "he sat in his cubicle for 8 hours".

Your objectives is your performance rating. Not being seen sitting in front of a screen pretending to work and taking 15 min coffee/bathroom breaks every 10 mins to pretend being busy.

You might work for fast food joints but top IT talent does dictate their work terms up to a point. The employer WANTS our expertise and proven track record. When you start treating folks like humans and respect your employees, they are more willing to go out of their way for you. This might blow your mind but it can be a 2 way conversation where everyone walks away happy instead of just slamming your fist on the desk screaming "Come to office now, I need to feel valuable!"
 
Back